The White Worker, the official publication of the American Nazi Party for which I am the editor, features a section called “News & Views”. The following was written for that section in the upcoming October issue.

Given the rapidity with which the news of the day seems to fly by, having a section devoted to “news” seems somewhat pointless. But not entirely. It is a question of focus, relevance, and importance. I suppose, to a great extent, “events” are synonymous with “news” in that the latter is often defined as a report of recent events. In this age of the 48-hour-a-day news cycle (I’m assuming everyone, like me, tends to “double screen”), events pile onto events in an avalanche of excrement.

We could list some events of note as found in the Daily News for example:

• In a speech, the president lashed out at fanatics and “bigots”, going so far as to call them the largest obstacle to world peace;
• Police responded to a bomb threat in New Jersey, having found the threat on a note left at an apartment building housing primarily minorities;
• Although the cause is still under investigation, a train has derailed in New Haven, once again highlighting the sorry condition of our public infrastructure;
• The war on drug-runners continues, sort of. A judge, promising heavy sentences, has decided four years in a federal penitentiary is enough for five persons convicted of selling illegal substances;
• An elderly couple is trying to recover their lost savings by suing the estate of the investor who who took their money and put it in an investment which almost immediately went bankrupt;
• It’s that time of year again: disease is cropping up overseas, this time in Manila. Grab your mask.

Here’s the thing: the president mentioned in the first news item was President Coolidge; The bomb threat was allegedly placed by the KKK, the “hate group” of the day; the derailed train was a no longer existent passenger train; the drug runners were selling “dope”, presumably marijuana, and four years “up state” was considered a long sentence when life spans were shorter; the “elderly couple” were literally described as “aged”, were a man 55-years old and his wife of 53 at a time when the average life expectancy was age 60.5; and the disease outbreak in Manila was cholera. The date of the paper from which I took these stories: October 7, 1925. One-hundred years ago.

So, that brings us back to today. We could list out a half-dozen or so events, believing them to be a sign of the times, and lament the state of affairs we find ourselves in. But how much of that is simply the cyclic nature of human existence?

That’s not to say events do not matter. Certainly they matter to those who experience them. And some events are so rare or singular that they can shift the course of human history far into the future: the Visigoths sacking Rome, the defeat of the Spanish Armada, or the assassination of Arch Duke Franz Ferdinand are examples.

But not having a crystal ball that actually works, I am hard-pressed to judge which events today are the sparks that will light the fire of real change, and which are the usual flashes of light that amount to nothing more than a puff of smoke. The cynic in me believes that much of this confusion is by design: by keeping us focused on the flashes in the pan, we miss the hands behind the scenes causing the spark. Whenever possible, I try to see the hand.

This is all a very long-winded way to get to one event I found difficult to look past, but look past it we must.

Most of you have probably heard about the murder of Iryna Zarutska in August of this year. I have a large write-up of the event, and those DEI hires responsible for her death, on this blog, dated September 17, 2025 (Beauty and the DEI Beasts: Remembering Iryna), so I will not cover it in depth here, and point you to that post if more information is needed. For our purposes, it is enough to know that Iryna, like so many White victims of violence today, was killed by a feral black reprobate who was allowed to walk the streets of civilized society after having been released at least fourteen times by our legal system. This is similar in some regards to the death of 22-year-old Logan Federico, a beautiful and productive member of our society, who was killed a few months earlier by another feral black during a home invasion. He had previously been arrested 39 times- including 25 felonies. Logan offered no resistance, but was killed anyway. Leaving aside the systemic breakdown that lets animals like this roam our streets, why do these beasts have so little regard for innocent human life? They seem to have two states of being: incarceration, or committing violent crime. There appears to be no middle ground. Why?

The Numbers

Both of these cases serve, sadly, as the tiny tip of a very large iceberg. Simply put, they underscore the inability of blacks to live with others in a civilized manner. No one in polite society likes to talk about this, of course. But the simple fact of the matter is that blacks commit more violent crimes per capita than any other race. Period.

In 2019, black people made up 12.2% of the U.S. population. Blacks, however, represent 26.6% of total arrests, including 51.2% of murder arrests, 52.7% of robbery arrests, 28.8% of burglary arrests, 28.6% of motor vehicle theft arrests, 42.2% of prostitution arrests, and 26.1% of drug arrests. According to the Bureau of Justice Statistics, black on White crime outnumbers White on black crime by nearly 3-to-1. In short, blacks are more prone to violence. That is what the numbers show. Period. Full stop.

Given these facts, and they are facts, the next logical question is: why? Why are blacks more prone to violence?

Whole careers have been made trying to answer (or dodge) this question. So we will not be able to discover a definitive answer here. Instead, I want to share one possible answer I found recently.

As with any aspect of human behavior, there are likely multiple reasons or causes for a given observation. This subject, the black predilection to violence, is no different. There are doubtless socio-economic influences to take into account; systemic factors that impact the reporting and prosecution; even temperature of the environment can play a role.

The Wiring

Then there is the most obvious and often most deliberately avoided reason: genetic or biological causes. Again, this can be a subject on which whole careers are based, but it is generally acknowledged (however begrudgingly) that blacks have smaller brains than Whites; that their brain morphology is different generally than other races; and that the frontal and temporal lobes of blacks are smaller and less developed than Whites. The frontal lobe is responsible for various functions, including reasoning, judgment, motor control, and social behavior, while the temporal lobe plays a role in processing auditory information, understanding language, forming memories, and regulating emotions.

I’m sure you see where I’m going with this: blacks are more prone to senseless violence as compared to Whites because they are wired that way.

But it gets more interesting when one asks why this should be so.

Ongoing Evolution

First, it is important to understand that there has been a debate in the scientific community going back to Charles Darwin and his idea of natural selection. Without getting into the weeds, natural selection is the driving force behind, or mechanism which enables, the process of evolution. Evolution is usually a slow process which is generally unobservable over the course of a single human lifetime. Accordingly, there are many scientists, usually sociologists with political agendas and not evolutionary biologists, who argue that humanity stopped evolving when agriculture was “discovered” some six thousand years ago. However, most serious scientists think this is hogwash, as humans are like any other biological organism when it comes to application of the laws of nature. True, we may be able to control our environment to an extent, but not entirely, and the feedback from that control can, in turn, alter the course of evolution- but it does not negate it.

So, given that humans do, in fact, still evolve, we can ask ourselves: what factors have played a role in the divergent evolution of blacks and Whites such that blacks have a more difficult time, in aggregate, regulating their violent behavior in civilized society? Again, there are undoubtedly innumerable pieces to this puzzle, but in researching why a feral black simian would brutally kill Iryna Zarutska for no reason, I came across an interesting paper in the scientific journal Evolutionary Psychology titled “Western Europe, State Formation, and Genetic Pacification” by Peter Frost, published in 2014. I highly recommend the paper, as it makes for fascinating reading and, as I said, drops one piece of the puzzle into place.

Culling The Herd

The premise is that as large Western European nations developed, the inclination to individual violence was effectively bred out of the White Western European race as the State increasingly assumed a “monopoly of the legitimate use of physical force in the enforcement of its order.”

The abstract from the paper sums it up nicely:

“Through its monopoly on violence, the State tends to pacify social relations. Such pacification proceeded slowly in Western Europe between the 5th and 11th centuries, being hindered by the rudimentary nature of law enforcement, the belief in a man’s right to settle personal disputes as he saw fit, and the Church’s opposition to the death penalty. These hindrances began to dissolve in the 11th century with a consensus by Church and State that the wicked should be punished so that the good may live in peace. Courts imposed the death penalty more and more often and, by the late Middle Ages, were condemning to death between 0.5 and 1.0% of all men of each generation, with perhaps just as many offenders dying at the scene of the crime or in prison while awaiting trial.

Meanwhile, the homicide rate plummeted from the 14th century to the 20th. The pool of violent men dried up until most murders occurred under conditions of jealousy, intoxication, or extreme stress. The decline in personal violence is usually attributed to harsher punishment and the longer-term effects of cultural conditioning. It may also be, however, that this new cultural environment selected against propensities for violence.”

The last sentence, “… that this new cultural environment selected against propensities for violence” is key, as that is referring directly to evolution. In short, dead murderers can’t bred. By removing them, century after century, from the population, whatever genetic component that influenced their extreme anti-social behavior was also removed from the environment as well. As the power of the State grew and its monopoly on the use of force expanded, the need (and ability to use without consequence) for the individual to partake in violence diminished. Likewise, the expansion of a “civilized” society- access to courts, written laws or rules of behavior, positive benefits from adhering to societal norms- created less provocation to violence in the first place.

What does this have to do with our initial inquiry? This gradual evolution to a less violent society took place in Western Europe, not Africa. Africans never culled the murderers out of their breeding stock. While we were building Notre Dame, exploring the world, laying roads, and building great nations, Africans were living in mud huts or wandering the plains following game herds hither-and-dither. They still are if they don’t receive aid from Western countries. Violence to them is still acceptable, tribal, personal, and the sole purview of whoever wields the largest machete. In short, where Whites have evolved to become capable of living among other Whites in a reasonably civilized manner, blacks have not.

Put It To A Test

Of course, I’m painting with a very broad brush here. I’m certain there are individual blacks who are quite capable of being more civilized than I am, and some allowance must be made for blacks that have been bred with Whites and for whom brain morphology is not a factor. But taken as a whole, their race is not. And we all know it- even those who are loath to say so.

It does not take a great deal of imagination to envision two different societies. Here is a thought experiment: Let’s take 1,000 Whites and plop them down in an environment fully capable of supporting them with some effort. Then let’s take 1,000 blacks and do the same somewhere else so the two groups cannot mix. All environmental factors being equal, what differences would you expect to see between those two societies after a few years? Which would you expect to be more civilized, with a functioning infrastructure and the rule of law- or at least some form of codified organization universally applicable, and which would you expect to be governed by primitive emotion and raw violence, populated with individuals incapable of caring for themselves, to say nothing of their neighbors.

Yeah, me too.

Amerika Erwache!

SUBSCRIBE TO THIS BLOG
(It’s free, and mostly painless)